Limited Liability Company – Standard Company

Angela Hodges • 6 October 2022

The usual company we think of is a standard, or limited liability company. 

This is the most common type of company incorporated under the Companies Act 1993, and it is a separate legal entity.  This means that it has a legal personality distinct from the directors and the shareholders.  The company has full responsibility for all of its legal and financial obligations. It must take care with the implementation and administration of all the company’s business and compliance matters.  The business activities of the company are separate from the individuals – and can provide the benefit of limited liability for the shareholders.

A blurry picture of a group of people sitting around a table.

The technical

The shareholders are generally only liable for any money they owe on their shares, or to the company. As well as any personal guarantees they have given to lenders or creditors, such as banks or suppliers. For many operating entities, this is very important as it ensures that the only assets at risk are those within the company (assuming external assets are not used to guarantee liabilities).

A limited liability company is the most commonly used business vehicle in New Zealand. It is easily understood by most people in business.  This means, contractual transactions, such as obtaining a line of credit, become reasonably straight forward whether that is from a bank or a supplier. The company should always maintain a separate bank account and keep separate records for evidentiary purposes. 

The legislative framework means that with the benefits there are also limitations. Companies in New Zealand must follow strict regulations, legislation, and guidelines, or face severe consequences. Companies are required by law to record shareholder meetings and other business activities. They must also file returns with the Companies office as and when necessary.

The tax

Incorporating a company in New Zealand means that you can take advantage of tax benefits. Whilst the income is retained in the company, the current tax rate for companies in New Zealand is 28% . Where tax paid income is paid out to shareholders, imputation credits can be attached to eliminate double taxation.  Shareholders are generally not liable for company tax debts. 

If the company has more than one investment or business venture, accessing cash may be difficult to do tax effectively.  Accessing capital gains accrued within the company is generally only able to be achieved tax effectively on liquidation. There can also be additional difficulties accessing capital gains for any shareholders who are non-residents.  Growth using capital gains may leave the shareholders exposed to overdrawn advance accounts. This can occur when income allocated is unable to keep up with drawings over time.

Transactions between associated persons (persons with common economic interests or family relationships) can create “tainted” capital gains. These tainted capital gains can still be taxable on distribution, even on liquidation.  Under the amended rules, tainted capital gains will still arise when a company transfers an asset to another company with 85% commonality of shareholding and ownership of the asset remains at 85% at the time the company is liquidated.

Fringe Benefit Tax may be payable on private use of company assets (e.g., motor vehicle) by a shareholder.  In addition, associated entity transactions (e.g., between businesses or other bodies that are connected to each other in some way) generally need to be made at market value. Otherwise a deemed dividend may arise, creating a potential tax headache. 

Change of ownership?

It is a simple process to change ownership in a company.  However, there are some things to be aware of.  Shareholder continuity must be maintained to protect tax losses and imputation credits for use in future income years.  Although there are new business continuity rules that can preserve the tax losses following a change of shareholding, these rules do not apply to imputation credits. 

On the sale of shares, unless the shares were acquired with the intention to dispose, or as part of a share trading business, proceeds from the sale should be capital (tax free) in nature. Any unrealised tax liabilities within the company will be transferred to the purchaser.

From a purchaser’s perspective, any unrealised tax liabilities existing with the company will be transferred to them as the new owner.  Any liabilities existing within the company will also remain within the company and transfer with the sale of shares.  Thus, there is always a word of warning when clients are considering purchasing shares.

What are the common issues we are seeing in practice?

We are continuing to see numerous companies with significantly overdrawn shareholder current accounts.  As companies are required to charge interest on these amounts, this results in taxable income in the company and large tax liabilities. 

These overdrawn shareholder current accounts have come about time and time again because the shareholders have outgrown their structures.  The company may have been accumulating capital gains over time, and now the shareholders want to return and live off those capital gains.  Or the company may have invested in a share portfolio, and the shareholders want to access those gains.  Or the company may have sold a business or a property, and although the company wants to continue to operate, the shareholders have withdrawn those funds.

Although there is pain involved in restructuring, it is generally needed in these circumstances and can result in significant tax savings over time. 

*This publication contains generic information only.  NZ Tax Desk Ltd is not responsible for any loss sustained by anyone relying on the contents of this publication.  We recommend you obtain specific taxation advice for your circumstances.

The post Limited Liability Company – Standard Company appeared first on .

A person is drawing a red circle around the number 30 on a calendar
by Angela Hodges 4 June 2025
The Deadline is Approaching for FY25 General Approval Applications
An aerial view of a parking lot filled with lots of cars.
by Angela Hodges 28 May 2025
The end of the Work Related Vehicle FBT Exemption.
A man is writing on a piece of paper while using a calculator.
by Angela Hodges 14 April 2025
If your business is carrying out research and development (R&D) work, you may be eligible to receive a cash payment from Inland Revenue— however there is limited time to act if you want to claim this for FY24.
A man in a suit and tie is holding a piece of paper in his hand.
by Angela Hodges 25 March 2025
Among the biggest winners from the Government’s proposed Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) reforms are likely to be US citizens living in New Zealand. The proposed Revenue Account Method, which is set to take effect from 1 April 2025, offers significant relief from the sometimes harsh and often unfair outcomes created when the US and NZ tax systems collide. The Double Tax Problem for US Citizens Unlike most countries, the United States taxes individuals based on citizenship, not residency. This means that US citizens remain fully taxable by the IRS no matter where in the world they live. When they become New Zealand tax residents, they are subject to NZ’s FIF rules – which tax unrealised gains each year. The problem is that these deemed gains are not recognised by the US tax system, which only taxes actual income or realised gains. This mismatch creates a common scenario where a US citizen in NZ pays tax to New Zealand on phantom FIF income (including unrealised capital gains) but then pays US tax again when the investment is eventually sold – with no US tax credit for the NZ tax already paid. The result is real, permanent double taxation. How the Revenue Account Method Helps The proposed Revenue Account Method addresses these challenges by bringing New Zealand’s tax treatment of FIF investments more in line with the US tax system, as it only taxes: Tax is only triggered when dividends are received or capital gains are realised, allowing US citizens to align taxable events across both jurisdictions. Capital gains are only partially taxed in NZ (70%), and foreign tax credits may be available in the US when realisation occurs (US tax advice will be required). For example, under current rules, FIF income is often calculated using the Fair Dividend Rate (FDR) method – which taxes 5% of the opening value of most foreign shares annually, even if no income is actually received. While this is straightforward from a compliance perspective, it does not align well with US capital gains tax rules, which only tax gains when they are realised. This mismatch can lead to several problems: Double taxation : US citizens in New Zealand can be taxed on notional income under the FIF regime that doesn’t correspond to any US tax liability, meaning no foreign tax credit is available in the US. Compliance complexity : The requirement to use different tax bases (realisation for US purposes, deemed accrual/unrealised gains in NZ) creates extra complexity for reporting and record-keeping. Cash flow issues : As no cash is received under FDR (and potentially CV), taxpayers may be forced to fund NZ tax from other sources or liquidate investments earlier than intended. For US citizens holding private equity, start-up shares, or unlisted interests acquired prior to NZ tax residency, this new method could make a substantial difference. It removes the need to fund NZ tax liabilities out of pocket for income never actually received. The new Revenue Account Method should be especially attractive to US citizens holding equity in start-ups, employee share schemes, or private investment vehicles, where growth potential is high but cash flow is minimal. However, it is important to remember that ultimately this method will still tax capital gains on these offshore investments, as well as taxing dividends. The Revenue Account Method should not be a default go-to for new residents, as some taxpayers may have more favourable outcomes with the existing FIF methods. See our more detailed article on the new Revenue Account Method here. Planning Tips for US Citizens and Advisors If you or your clients are US citizens becoming NZ tax residents, consider the following planning steps: Document asset values on entry : For investments eligible for the Revenue Account Method, the cost base will be the value at the time NZ tax residence begins. A formal valuation may be required to substantiate this. Review eligibility : Confirm that the taxpayer became fully tax resident in NZ on or after 1 April 2024 and that investments were acquired before residency (or pursuant to pre-residency arrangements). Coordinate with US tax advisors : Cross-border alignment is key. A coordinated strategy that considers both US and NZ tax consequences will reduce surprises and improve outcomes. Contact us to discuss how these changes could affect your US-NZ tax position. Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personalised tax advice. You should consult with a qualified tax adviser familiar with both US and NZ tax systems before making any decisions based on this content.
A city skyline with a stock chart in the foreground.
by Angela Hodges 25 March 2025
A Welcome Boost for Migrants and Returning Kiwis
by Angela Hodges 24 February 2025
Act Now: Help Your Clients Remove Properties from the GST Net Before the Deadline
by Angela Hodges 15 January 2025
As tax advisors, we know there has long been contention around the tax treatment of loyalty points and rewards. We have seen numerous times how large these benefits can actually be. It’s an issue that has largely been overlooked, and something that clients have certainly not wanted to know about.
by Angela Hodges 28 November 2024
As accountants, you're often confronted with specific scenarios regarding Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) and Goods and Services Tax (GST). Below are answers to some common questions.
A couple booking accommodation on their mobile phone.
by Angela Hodges 29 September 2024
How Upcoming Tax Changes Could Streamline Reporting for Short-Stay Accommodation Providers
by Angela Hodges 30 June 2024
The Inland Revenue has recently released a new draft Interpretation Statement, PUB 0040: Income tax – overdrawn shareholder loan account balances . This statement is currently open for consultation until 2 August 2024. Family-owned small businesses often operate through close companies. Given the significant control shareholders have over these companies, it is common for them to withdraw company funds for personal use. These amounts are commonly transacted through the Shareholder Current Account. The issue is when these Shareholder Current Accounts become overdrawn. In practice, the reasoning behind an overdrawn Shareholder Current Account can often be the sale of a capital asset and the withdrawal of those funds by the shareholder (without declaring a dividend). Unfortunately, we also commonly see this when a company, or the shareholders, are struggling financially. In this context it is perhaps timely, given the struggles businesses have been going through, for the Inland Revenue to issue a reminder about the potential tax issues these overdrawn Shareholder Current Accounts can present. Understanding Shareholder Loan Accounts and Their Tax Implications Firstly, the Inland Revenue refers to a Shareholder Loan Account. In practice, this is often a Shareholder Current Account, thus I have used the terminology interchangeably. Shareholder Current Accounts are generally informal arrangements between close companies and their shareholders, documenting any advances made between the two. When a shareholder withdraws more money from the company than they have advanced, the account becomes overdrawn, leading to several potential tax issues. The following tax issues apply equally to a Shareholder Loan balance, where the shareholder owes the company funds. Tax Issues Arising from Overdrawn Shareholder Loan Accounts 1. Dividend Income: If a shareholder pays no or low interest on an overdrawn loan account, dividend income may arise. For this reason, the company will generally charge the shareholders interest on the overdrawn shareholder current account. 2. Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT): Shareholder-employees who pay no or low interest on their overdrawn accounts may face FBT liabilities. 3. Interest Income: Companies charging interest on overdrawn accounts generate interest income. This interest will be taxable income to the company and may be non-deductible to the shareholder (discussed further below). 4. Resident Withholding Tax (RWT): Companies can claim a tax credit for RWT withheld from interest payable. The credit is claimable in the year the interest is derived, provided the RWT has been paid to Inland Revenue. 5. Interest Deductibility: Interest paid by shareholders on overdrawn accounts is typically not deductible as it often funds private expenditure. However, if the borrowed money is used for income-earning activities or businesses, a deduction may be available, subject to documentation and general limitations. 6. Withholding and Reporting Requirements: Shareholders paying RWT may have obligations to deduct RWT on interest paid to the company on the balance of the current account (or loan). 7. Debt Forgiveness: If a shareholder is relieved of their obligation to repay an overdrawn loan balance, this typically results in taxable debt remission income for the shareholder. For this reason, the company cannot simply forgive the loan or overdrawn balance. Importantly, the company should never be wound up with the shareholders owing the company funds, as this could also trigger taxable debt remission income. Beyond the scope of the Interpretation Statement, there are additional potential tax issues to consider with Shareholder Current Accounts: 8. Salary: If the shareholder is taking regular drawings to meet their living costs, there is support for the Inland Revenue to reconstitute these drawings as taxable salary or personal services income in some circumstances. This is particularly where the company has not paid the shareholder a reasonable market salary or met the personal services or attribution rules. 9. Documentation: There is caselaw in which loan repayments have been reconstituted as taxable income to the shareholder, however those are extreme examples involving an absence of documentation. It is always important to document all loans to the company. Any transactions between the company and the shareholder should include clear narrations e.g. on the bank transfer. Take care in those narrations, if something is labelled “salary”, chances are the IRD would argue it should be taxed as such. Understanding these tax implications is crucial for both companies and shareholders to ensure compliance and optimize their tax positions. *This publication contains generic information only. NZ Tax Desk Ltd is not responsible for any loss sustained by anyone relying on the contents of this publication. We recommend you obtain specific taxation advice for your circumstances.
More posts