New Employee Share Option Rules

Angela Hodges • 23 October 2025

Why You Can Now Trigger Tax Without Exercising

New Zealand’s latest tax bill makes major changes to how Employee Share Schemes (ESS) are taxed, especially for options and deferred shares.


While the new rules are designed to help employees of unlisted and start-up companies manage cashflow and valuation difficulties, there is also a sting in the tail in these rules. It’s now clear that employees can suffer a tax cost on options, even if they are never exercised.


Current Rules: The Starting Point
Employees who receive shares under an ESS are taxed on the market value of the shares less any amount they pay for them.


That market value is measured at the “Share Scheme Taxing Date”, which is generally when:

  • The employee effectively owns the shares unconditionally, equivalent to other shareholders.
  • There is no material risk that beneficial ownership will change or that the shares could be transferred or cancelled.
  • The employee is not protected from a fall in share value.
  • There is no material risk that the terms of the shares will change in a way that impacts their value.

In short: it’s essentially the date the employee’s ownership becomes unconditional.


However, this causes practical problems:

  • Difficulty measuring the market value of unlisted shares.
  • Cashflow issues when employees must pay tax but cannot sell shares.
  • Employer reporting obligations under PAYE/ESS rules.


In terms of options, the historic shorthand has been “taxed when exercised, not when vested.”
That assumption no longer always holds true.


The 2025 Bill – New Deferral Election for Unlisted Companies
From 1 April 2026, it will be possible for employees of unlisted companies to elect to defer tax on ESS benefits until a liquidity event, when, in theory, the shares can be valued and sold more easily.


How it works:

  • The employer makes an election for certain shares to be “Employee Deferred Shares”.
  • The election is made at the time the shares are issued or transferred to the employee.
  • The Share Scheme Taxing Date is deferred to the earliest liquidity event, namely:
  • a listing of the company;
  • a sale or cancellation of the share; or
  • the payment of a dividend on that share.


At that point, the employee is taxed on the market value of the shares minus any amount paid for them.

Employer reporting and withholding obligations remain the same, the only change is the timing of the taxing date. Employers must also notify Inland Revenue when shares are designated as Employee Deferred Shares.



The key advantage of deferring the Share Scheme Taxing Date to a liquidity event is to align with cashflow. Employees are taxed when they can access funds — for example, on sale or IPO — rather than at an earlier point when the shares are illiquid and difficult to value. This also reduces the need for costly private valuations at vesting.


However, the trade-off is that tax is calculated on the market value of the shares at the time of the liquidity event (the new Share Scheme Taxing Date). If the company’s value has significantly increased, the taxable benefit, and therefore the tax liability, will also be higher.


This is an important trade-off for employees to consider. Employees may face a larger tax bill later, but they should have cash available from the liquidity event to fund that tax payment.


The Stinger – Change to the Definition of the Share Scheme Taxing Date
The legislation also includes a key change to the Employee Share Scheme Taxing Date, which could have a significant impact on companies with employees sitting on options.


From 1 April 2026, the Share Scheme Taxing Date occurs when:

  1. Shares are held by or for the benefit of the ESS beneficiary; or
  2. The beneficiary has an unconditional right to presently receive the shares.


The phrase “unconditional right to presently receive shares” refers to a point where the employee’s entitlement to the shares is no longer contingent on any remaining conditions, approvals, or future events — even if the legal transfer of the shares has not yet taken place.


In other words, the employee has done everything required under the scheme to earn the shares, and the employer (or trustee) is obliged to deliver them.


At that point, the employee’s right to the shares is enforceable, and Inland Revenue considers that they have effectively derived the economic benefit. This will trigger a tax obligation for the employee in respect of these options, even when they have not been exercised.


Inland Revenue’s reasoning is that once the right is unconditional, the employee has economic ownership of the shares and has effectively derived the ESS benefit, even if the paperwork or share register update follows later.

Employers should review their vesting and exercise provisions carefully.


Where the plan gives employees a present, unconditional right (for example, after a time-based vesting date with no further performance or employment conditions), the taxing point may occur automatically, even if the shares are not yet transferred.


These rules are intended to apply from 1 April 2026. If you have options in place now, or are designing an Employee Share Scheme, we recommend reviewing the terms prior to 1 April 2026.


Contact us to discuss how these changes could affect your tax position as a new or returning New Zealand resident with overseas investments.


Disclaimer:
The information provided in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personalised tax advice. You should consult with a qualified tax adviser familiar with both New Zealand tax rules and any relevant overseas tax systems before making decisions based on this content.

by Angela Hodges 24 September 2025
What you need to know for new residents
by Angela Hodges 29 August 2025
The recently introduced Tax Bill includes significant tax changes for remote workers, including surprising tax reforms granting digital nomads a brand-new tax concession intended to reflect the visitor visa conditions. A New Tax Exemption for “Non Resident Visitors” Currently the NZ tax residency rules are not aligned with immigration visa conditions, which has led to unexpected tax consequences for many visitors. Individuals who spend 183 days or more in NZ may be deemed tax resident from the first day of their stay. Likewise, salary earned from a non-resident employer could be taxable in NZ, without a foreign tax credit recognising tax paid offshore. We have worked with many individuals who have had significant and unexpected tax liabilities because of these rules. The Proposal A pivotal change is the introduction of a new “non-resident visitor” tax status which will provide an exemption from the 183-day test. Under the proposed law, individuals who meet the following requirements should not become NZ tax residents, despite their extended stay: • are in NZ for 275 days or fewer within any 18 month period, • were not NZ tax residents or transitional residents immediately before arrival, • are lawfully present, • are not receiving a family scheme entitlement, and • remain tax residents of a foreign jurisdiction that imposes an income tax substantially similar to NZ’s. This exemption lifts them out of the 183-day rule that would traditionally trigger tax residency. Key Conditions: • Work must be exclusively for overseas clients or employers. • No on-site services to NZ individuals/businesses. • Work must not require the person to be physically present in NZ. • Must not undertake promotional work in NZ for NZ businesses. Interestingly, the carve-out for work that requires a person to be physically present in NZ uses an example of an influencer. The influencer is required to be physically present in NZ for her work, for example, a travel blogger. Such a person would not qualify for the exemption. Income Exemptions Clarified Under the proposed rules, certain categories of income are explicitly exempt for non-resident visitors: • Personal or professional services income earned while in NZ, provided it meets the non-resident visitor criteria. • Business income earned by a non-resident business or self-employed person that might otherwise be sourced in NZ due to a visitor’s presence is also exempt, unless it arises from a permanent establishment. • Income earned by a public entertainer is not covered by the proposed tax exemptions. Importantly, the activities of a non-resident visitor will be disregarded when determining whether a foreign entity has a permanent establishment in NZ. These proposals should ensure that remote work for foreign clients doesn’t inadvertently trigger NZ tax or permanent establishment issues. GST Registration Becomes Optional The Bill also proposes making GST registration optional for remote workers providing zero-rated services to overseas clients, even if their (zero-rated) turnover exceeds NZD 60,000. Looking Ahead If enacted from 1 April 2026, these proposals represent a significant shift in how New Zealand taxes visiting individuals and their non-resident employers. By aligning the tax rules with the conditions of visitor visas, the reforms introduce a welcome simplification and surprising tax relief. If you’re a remote worker, digital nomad, or employer wanting to understand how these changes may affect you, get in touch. Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personalised tax advice. You should consult with a qualified tax adviser familiar with both US and NZ tax systems before making any decisions based on this content. 
by Angela Hodges 28 July 2025
Double Cab Utes, Perk Vehicles, and the End of the Exemption Era
A person is drawing a red circle around the number 30 on a calendar
by Angela Hodges 4 June 2025
The Deadline is Approaching for FY25 General Approval Applications
An aerial view of a parking lot filled with lots of cars.
by Angela Hodges 28 May 2025
The end of the Work Related Vehicle FBT Exemption.
A man is writing on a piece of paper while using a calculator.
by Angela Hodges 14 April 2025
If your business is carrying out research and development (R&D) work, you may be eligible to receive a cash payment from Inland Revenue— however there is limited time to act if you want to claim this for FY24.
A man in a suit and tie is holding a piece of paper in his hand.
by Angela Hodges 25 March 2025
Among the biggest winners from the Government’s proposed Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) reforms are likely to be US citizens living in New Zealand. The proposed Revenue Account Method, which is set to take effect from 1 April 2025, offers significant relief from the sometimes harsh and often unfair outcomes created when the US and NZ tax systems collide. The Double Tax Problem for US Citizens Unlike most countries, the United States taxes individuals based on citizenship, not residency. This means that US citizens remain fully taxable by the IRS no matter where in the world they live. When they become New Zealand tax residents, they are subject to NZ’s FIF rules – which tax unrealised gains each year. The problem is that these deemed gains are not recognised by the US tax system, which only taxes actual income or realised gains. This mismatch creates a common scenario where a US citizen in NZ pays tax to New Zealand on phantom FIF income (including unrealised capital gains) but then pays US tax again when the investment is eventually sold – with no US tax credit for the NZ tax already paid. The result is real, permanent double taxation. How the Revenue Account Method Helps The proposed Revenue Account Method addresses these challenges by bringing New Zealand’s tax treatment of FIF investments more in line with the US tax system, as it only taxes: Tax is only triggered when dividends are received or capital gains are realised, allowing US citizens to align taxable events across both jurisdictions. Capital gains are only partially taxed in NZ (70%), and foreign tax credits may be available in the US when realisation occurs (US tax advice will be required). For example, under current rules, FIF income is often calculated using the Fair Dividend Rate (FDR) method – which taxes 5% of the opening value of most foreign shares annually, even if no income is actually received. While this is straightforward from a compliance perspective, it does not align well with US capital gains tax rules, which only tax gains when they are realised. This mismatch can lead to several problems: Double taxation : US citizens in New Zealand can be taxed on notional income under the FIF regime that doesn’t correspond to any US tax liability, meaning no foreign tax credit is available in the US. Compliance complexity : The requirement to use different tax bases (realisation for US purposes, deemed accrual/unrealised gains in NZ) creates extra complexity for reporting and record-keeping. Cash flow issues : As no cash is received under FDR (and potentially CV), taxpayers may be forced to fund NZ tax from other sources or liquidate investments earlier than intended. For US citizens holding private equity, start-up shares, or unlisted interests acquired prior to NZ tax residency, this new method could make a substantial difference. It removes the need to fund NZ tax liabilities out of pocket for income never actually received. The new Revenue Account Method should be especially attractive to US citizens holding equity in start-ups, employee share schemes, or private investment vehicles, where growth potential is high but cash flow is minimal. However, it is important to remember that ultimately this method will still tax capital gains on these offshore investments, as well as taxing dividends. The Revenue Account Method should not be a default go-to for new residents, as some taxpayers may have more favourable outcomes with the existing FIF methods. See our more detailed article on the new Revenue Account Method here. Planning Tips for US Citizens and Advisors If you or your clients are US citizens becoming NZ tax residents, consider the following planning steps: Document asset values on entry : For investments eligible for the Revenue Account Method, the cost base will be the value at the time NZ tax residence begins. A formal valuation may be required to substantiate this. Review eligibility : Confirm that the taxpayer became fully tax resident in NZ on or after 1 April 2024 and that investments were acquired before residency (or pursuant to pre-residency arrangements). Coordinate with US tax advisors : Cross-border alignment is key. A coordinated strategy that considers both US and NZ tax consequences will reduce surprises and improve outcomes. Contact us to discuss how these changes could affect your US-NZ tax position. Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personalised tax advice. You should consult with a qualified tax adviser familiar with both US and NZ tax systems before making any decisions based on this content.
A city skyline with a stock chart in the foreground.
by Angela Hodges 25 March 2025
A Welcome Boost for Migrants and Returning Kiwis
by Angela Hodges 24 February 2025
Act Now: Help Your Clients Remove Properties from the GST Net Before the Deadline
by Angela Hodges 15 January 2025
As tax advisors, we know there has long been contention around the tax treatment of loyalty points and rewards. We have seen numerous times how large these benefits can actually be. It’s an issue that has largely been overlooked, and something that clients have certainly not wanted to know about.