Moving to NZ. Keeping your home overseas?

Angela • 15 December 2020

Having an overseas rental property could cost you more than you think. But we can help you to manage that cost.

We have many clients that, when moving to New Zealand, decide to keep their home offshore.  This can be a great back-up if you want to return, and of course, your home may contain many happy memories, and you just may not want to part with it.  However, you need to be aware of the New Zealand tax implications if you keep your overseas property and rent it out. 

Firstly, most new residents should qualify for the Transitional Resident Exemption. This is a four-year tax exemption on certain categories of overseas income.  Whilst you are Transitional Resident, you generally should not need to worry about New Zealand tax on the overseas property.  However, you need to know how keeping this property is going to impact your New Zealand tax position, after your Transitional Resident period. 

The following discussion relates to someone who has become a New Zealand tax resident, who is not a Transitional Resident.

Overseas Rental Income

Let’s start with overseas rental income.  Once you are a New Zealand tax resident, and your Transitional Resident period has expired, you will need to include any overseas rental income in your New Zealand tax return.  Where you have paid tax offshore, you are likely to receive a credit for that tax paid.  However, there are a number of discrepancies which mean there is often more tax to be paid in New Zealand.

Firstly, your overseas rental income must be re-calculated in accordance with New Zealand tax legislation.  Unfortunately, we can’t simply use the rental income in your overseas tax return.  Re-calculating the rental income under New Zealand’s tax rules is likely to result in a different rental income figure.

We particularly see issues with countries where there is a tax-free threshold, such as the United Kingdom.  Or countries which have large deductions available for property owners, that New Zealand doesn’t recognise, such as the United States.  These issues often mean that when we re-calculate the rental income under the New Zealand tax rules, the client has additional tax to pay in New Zealand.

Conversion into New Zealand dollars

The overseas income needs to be converted into New Zealand dollars.  Specific rules apply. 

Foreign loans on your overseas rental property

Foreign loans or mortgages can create nasty surprises for new residents. 

It is common for clients to still have an overseas loan in relation to the rental property (a mortgage). However, these loans can create issues under both the Non-Resident Withholding Tax and Financial Arrangement rules.  These regimes add further complexity, time, and costs to owning an overseas rental property.  We discuss these rules further below.

Non-Resident Withholding Tax (NRWT) issues

NRWT is a form of withholding tax.  This means the payer deducts an amount from the payment. The payer then pays this to the IRD rather than the intended recipient of the payment. 

Where a New Zealand tax resident pays interest to an overseas bank, that person may need to first deduct NRWT from the payment, and instead, pay this to Inland Revenue.  However, as most banks will not let you deduct any payments from their interest charge, chances are you will be paying the NRWT on top of your mortgage payment. 

NRWT is generally deducted at 15% (of the payment). This can be reduced in some cases, depending on whether there is a Double Tax Agreement in place. 

There is an alternative to NRWT.  If you qualify, the Approved Issuer Levy (AIL) regime requires a payment of a 2% levy, rather than the 15% NRWT.  However, as this registration cannot be back-dated, you need to ensure you are set up ready to go before the end of your Transitional Resident Exemption.

Gains and losses on overseas loans

The Financial Arrangement (FA) rules are complex (and particularly nasty).  However, you need to consider them if you have an overseas loan or mortgage.

Essentially the calculations will tax any gain or loss incurred in relation to the mortgage.  This includes any foreign exchange gain or loss.  For example, if you start with a mortgage equivalent to NZD500,000, and you make no principal repayments, and at the end of the period the mortgage is revalued, according to the exchange rate at that time, at NZD400,000, you have effectively made a gain of NZD100,000.  This is because your liability, in NZD, has reduced. 

New Zealand may tax this gain under the Financial Arrangement regime.  You could be taxed annually, or at the end of the loan period (generally when it is repaid), depending on the applicable rules.  This calculation can be particularly complicated and can result in a tax liability, despite the absence of any realised cash gain available to pay that liability.

A large white house with a large porch is sitting on top of a lush green hill.

Selling your overseas rental property

Finally, when the time comes to sell your overseas property, you may also be caught by New Zealand’s “bright-line test”.   The “bright-line test” can tax a gain on the sale of rental properties that are bought and sold within ten years, regardless of where the property is located and irrespective of whether tax is paid in that overseas country.

You may qualify for a foreign tax credit in New Zealand if you have also paid tax in the overseas country.  Where available, a foreign tax credit can effectively reduce any double tax impact.  Unfortunately, this can be difficult.  We strongly advise you get specialist New Zealand tax advice before you sign an Agreement to sell the property.  We are happy to help.

Overall, there are a number of fish-hooks if you own overseas properties once you become tax resident in New Zealand.  However, we can help you to manage this risk.  If you wish to keep your overseas home we recommend you talk to us as soon as possible, and ideally before you move to New Zealand.

If you have any questions, or would like further advice regarding your overseas property, please contact Angela now.

Angela Hodges portrait - a woman in a blue shirt is smiling for the camera.

Angela Hodges

E: angela.hodges@nztaxdesk.co.nz

P: +64 (0)21 023 08149

*This publication contains generic information and opinion.  New Zealand Tax Desk is not responsible for any loss sustained by anyone relying on the contents of this publication.  We recommend you obtain specific taxation advice for your circumstances.

The post Moving to NZ. Keeping your home overseas? appeared first on .

A person is drawing a red circle around the number 30 on a calendar
by Angela Hodges 4 June 2025
The Deadline is Approaching for FY25 General Approval Applications
An aerial view of a parking lot filled with lots of cars.
by Angela Hodges 28 May 2025
The end of the Work Related Vehicle FBT Exemption.
A man is writing on a piece of paper while using a calculator.
by Angela Hodges 14 April 2025
If your business is carrying out research and development (R&D) work, you may be eligible to receive a cash payment from Inland Revenue— however there is limited time to act if you want to claim this for FY24.
A man in a suit and tie is holding a piece of paper in his hand.
by Angela Hodges 25 March 2025
Among the biggest winners from the Government’s proposed Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) reforms are likely to be US citizens living in New Zealand. The proposed Revenue Account Method, which is set to take effect from 1 April 2025, offers significant relief from the sometimes harsh and often unfair outcomes created when the US and NZ tax systems collide. The Double Tax Problem for US Citizens Unlike most countries, the United States taxes individuals based on citizenship, not residency. This means that US citizens remain fully taxable by the IRS no matter where in the world they live. When they become New Zealand tax residents, they are subject to NZ’s FIF rules – which tax unrealised gains each year. The problem is that these deemed gains are not recognised by the US tax system, which only taxes actual income or realised gains. This mismatch creates a common scenario where a US citizen in NZ pays tax to New Zealand on phantom FIF income (including unrealised capital gains) but then pays US tax again when the investment is eventually sold – with no US tax credit for the NZ tax already paid. The result is real, permanent double taxation. How the Revenue Account Method Helps The proposed Revenue Account Method addresses these challenges by bringing New Zealand’s tax treatment of FIF investments more in line with the US tax system, as it only taxes: Tax is only triggered when dividends are received or capital gains are realised, allowing US citizens to align taxable events across both jurisdictions. Capital gains are only partially taxed in NZ (70%), and foreign tax credits may be available in the US when realisation occurs (US tax advice will be required). For example, under current rules, FIF income is often calculated using the Fair Dividend Rate (FDR) method – which taxes 5% of the opening value of most foreign shares annually, even if no income is actually received. While this is straightforward from a compliance perspective, it does not align well with US capital gains tax rules, which only tax gains when they are realised. This mismatch can lead to several problems: Double taxation : US citizens in New Zealand can be taxed on notional income under the FIF regime that doesn’t correspond to any US tax liability, meaning no foreign tax credit is available in the US. Compliance complexity : The requirement to use different tax bases (realisation for US purposes, deemed accrual/unrealised gains in NZ) creates extra complexity for reporting and record-keeping. Cash flow issues : As no cash is received under FDR (and potentially CV), taxpayers may be forced to fund NZ tax from other sources or liquidate investments earlier than intended. For US citizens holding private equity, start-up shares, or unlisted interests acquired prior to NZ tax residency, this new method could make a substantial difference. It removes the need to fund NZ tax liabilities out of pocket for income never actually received. The new Revenue Account Method should be especially attractive to US citizens holding equity in start-ups, employee share schemes, or private investment vehicles, where growth potential is high but cash flow is minimal. However, it is important to remember that ultimately this method will still tax capital gains on these offshore investments, as well as taxing dividends. The Revenue Account Method should not be a default go-to for new residents, as some taxpayers may have more favourable outcomes with the existing FIF methods. See our more detailed article on the new Revenue Account Method here. Planning Tips for US Citizens and Advisors If you or your clients are US citizens becoming NZ tax residents, consider the following planning steps: Document asset values on entry : For investments eligible for the Revenue Account Method, the cost base will be the value at the time NZ tax residence begins. A formal valuation may be required to substantiate this. Review eligibility : Confirm that the taxpayer became fully tax resident in NZ on or after 1 April 2024 and that investments were acquired before residency (or pursuant to pre-residency arrangements). Coordinate with US tax advisors : Cross-border alignment is key. A coordinated strategy that considers both US and NZ tax consequences will reduce surprises and improve outcomes. Contact us to discuss how these changes could affect your US-NZ tax position. Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personalised tax advice. You should consult with a qualified tax adviser familiar with both US and NZ tax systems before making any decisions based on this content.
A city skyline with a stock chart in the foreground.
by Angela Hodges 25 March 2025
A Welcome Boost for Migrants and Returning Kiwis
by Angela Hodges 24 February 2025
Act Now: Help Your Clients Remove Properties from the GST Net Before the Deadline
by Angela Hodges 15 January 2025
As tax advisors, we know there has long been contention around the tax treatment of loyalty points and rewards. We have seen numerous times how large these benefits can actually be. It’s an issue that has largely been overlooked, and something that clients have certainly not wanted to know about.
by Angela Hodges 28 November 2024
As accountants, you're often confronted with specific scenarios regarding Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) and Goods and Services Tax (GST). Below are answers to some common questions.
A couple booking accommodation on their mobile phone.
by Angela Hodges 29 September 2024
How Upcoming Tax Changes Could Streamline Reporting for Short-Stay Accommodation Providers
by Angela Hodges 30 June 2024
The Inland Revenue has recently released a new draft Interpretation Statement, PUB 0040: Income tax – overdrawn shareholder loan account balances . This statement is currently open for consultation until 2 August 2024. Family-owned small businesses often operate through close companies. Given the significant control shareholders have over these companies, it is common for them to withdraw company funds for personal use. These amounts are commonly transacted through the Shareholder Current Account. The issue is when these Shareholder Current Accounts become overdrawn. In practice, the reasoning behind an overdrawn Shareholder Current Account can often be the sale of a capital asset and the withdrawal of those funds by the shareholder (without declaring a dividend). Unfortunately, we also commonly see this when a company, or the shareholders, are struggling financially. In this context it is perhaps timely, given the struggles businesses have been going through, for the Inland Revenue to issue a reminder about the potential tax issues these overdrawn Shareholder Current Accounts can present. Understanding Shareholder Loan Accounts and Their Tax Implications Firstly, the Inland Revenue refers to a Shareholder Loan Account. In practice, this is often a Shareholder Current Account, thus I have used the terminology interchangeably. Shareholder Current Accounts are generally informal arrangements between close companies and their shareholders, documenting any advances made between the two. When a shareholder withdraws more money from the company than they have advanced, the account becomes overdrawn, leading to several potential tax issues. The following tax issues apply equally to a Shareholder Loan balance, where the shareholder owes the company funds. Tax Issues Arising from Overdrawn Shareholder Loan Accounts 1. Dividend Income: If a shareholder pays no or low interest on an overdrawn loan account, dividend income may arise. For this reason, the company will generally charge the shareholders interest on the overdrawn shareholder current account. 2. Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT): Shareholder-employees who pay no or low interest on their overdrawn accounts may face FBT liabilities. 3. Interest Income: Companies charging interest on overdrawn accounts generate interest income. This interest will be taxable income to the company and may be non-deductible to the shareholder (discussed further below). 4. Resident Withholding Tax (RWT): Companies can claim a tax credit for RWT withheld from interest payable. The credit is claimable in the year the interest is derived, provided the RWT has been paid to Inland Revenue. 5. Interest Deductibility: Interest paid by shareholders on overdrawn accounts is typically not deductible as it often funds private expenditure. However, if the borrowed money is used for income-earning activities or businesses, a deduction may be available, subject to documentation and general limitations. 6. Withholding and Reporting Requirements: Shareholders paying RWT may have obligations to deduct RWT on interest paid to the company on the balance of the current account (or loan). 7. Debt Forgiveness: If a shareholder is relieved of their obligation to repay an overdrawn loan balance, this typically results in taxable debt remission income for the shareholder. For this reason, the company cannot simply forgive the loan or overdrawn balance. Importantly, the company should never be wound up with the shareholders owing the company funds, as this could also trigger taxable debt remission income. Beyond the scope of the Interpretation Statement, there are additional potential tax issues to consider with Shareholder Current Accounts: 8. Salary: If the shareholder is taking regular drawings to meet their living costs, there is support for the Inland Revenue to reconstitute these drawings as taxable salary or personal services income in some circumstances. This is particularly where the company has not paid the shareholder a reasonable market salary or met the personal services or attribution rules. 9. Documentation: There is caselaw in which loan repayments have been reconstituted as taxable income to the shareholder, however those are extreme examples involving an absence of documentation. It is always important to document all loans to the company. Any transactions between the company and the shareholder should include clear narrations e.g. on the bank transfer. Take care in those narrations, if something is labelled “salary”, chances are the IRD would argue it should be taxed as such. Understanding these tax implications is crucial for both companies and shareholders to ensure compliance and optimize their tax positions. *This publication contains generic information only. NZ Tax Desk Ltd is not responsible for any loss sustained by anyone relying on the contents of this publication. We recommend you obtain specific taxation advice for your circumstances.
More posts