Proposed Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) Changes

Angela Hodges • 25 March 2025

A Welcome Boost for Migrants and Returning Kiwis

The Government has recently announced proposed changes to modernise the Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) rules, aiming to make New Zealand a more attractive place to live and invest for skilled migrants, returning New Zealanders, and internationally mobile professionals. Announced on 12 March 2025, the proposed changes are designed to ease tax burdens that have previously acted as a barrier to relocation.


Why does NZ have FIF Rules?
New Zealand introduced the Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) regime in the early 1990s as a response to a structural gap in our tax system — the absence of a general capital gains tax. The concern was that New Zealand tax residents investing in offshore companies, particularly US-based ones known for retaining earnings rather than paying dividends, could effectively escape tax altogether: no tax on dividends (because none were paid) and no tax on capital gains (because we don’t generally tax gains on sale). To plug this gap, the FIF rules were brought in to tax a deemed return on these investments, regardless of whether income was actually received.


New Zealand was something of a guinea pig - the idea was that other countries would follow suit, but they didn’t, leaving us with a complex and often punitive regime unique in the world. The rules have remained largely unchanged for decades and have caused significant issues for globally mobile individuals. In particular, US citizens have borne the brunt, as they continue to be taxed by the US on realised capital gains, but without being able to claim a credit for the tax they’ve already paid to New Zealand on unrealised FIF income — often leading to costly double taxation outcomes.

It is fair to say these rules have proved an impediment to migration to New Zealand time and time again.


Policy Context and Ministerial Commentary
Speaking at the NZX Investment Summit, Revenue Minister Simon Watts acknowledged that current FIF rules have deterred international talent and capital from relocating to New Zealand. The existing regime, which often taxes unrealised gains, was seen as penalising migrants simply for choosing to settle here.

The changes are part of a broader government strategy to support innovation, retain talent, and create a globally competitive tax environment that can keep pace with modern economic realities. The proposed changes are expected to apply from 1 April 2025, subject to legislative process.


What’s Changing – The Revenue Account Method
At the centre of the reform is a new Revenue Account Method. This method is designed to be a more cash-flow-aligned way of taxing offshore investments.

Under the proposed rules, eligible individuals will be able to elect into the Revenue Account Method, which calculates taxable income from FIF interests as:

  • Dividends received, plus
  • 70% of any realised capital gains

Key features:

  • Losses can also be recognised, with 70% of any realised loss available to offset taxable income (ring-fenced)
  • Tax is only triggered when there is actual cash flow – through dividends or sale proceeds
  • It is an optional method – existing methods such as FDR and comparative value can still be used

This approach aligns more closely with common international tax practices, where tax is typically levied on actual gains or income.
These changes should better align tax with actual cash flows and investment outcomes, especially for early-stage or private-equity-style investments, which are often held by professionals in the tech and start-up sectors.

However, it is important to remember that ultimately this method will still tax capital gains on these offshore investments, as well as taxing dividends. The Revenue Account Method should not be a default go-to for new residents, as some taxpayers may have more favourable outcomes with the existing FIF methods.


Who Can Use the Revenue Account Method?
The method will be available to:

  • New migrants who become fully New Zealand tax resident on or after 1 April 2024
  • Returning New Zealanders who have been non-resident for a minimum period (likely less than 10 years, but exact timeframe to be confirmed)
  • Trusts, where the principal settlor would meet the above eligibility


Which Investments Are Covered?
In most cases, the Revenue Account Method can only apply to:

  • Unlisted FIF interests, and
  • Interests that were either acquired before becoming New Zealand resident, or under arrangements entered into pre-residency

However, individuals who remain subject to citizenship-based taxation (such as US citizens) will be able to apply the method to all their FIF investments. This is especially beneficial for US taxpayers living in New Zealand, who often face complex interactions and double taxation between US and NZ tax rules.


If a Taxpayer Leaves New Zealand
If someone using the Revenue Account Method ceases to be a New Zealand tax resident, an exit tax may apply. This would deem a disposal of their qualifying FIF interests at market value immediately before departure. This mechanism is consistent with international practices and captures tax on gains accrued while the individual was resident.


Example – Bart: A Returning Kiwi in Tech
Scenario:
 Adam, a 37-year-old Kiwi, is the CTO of a successful US-based start-up. He owns a 1% stake (worth NZ$2 million) in the company, acquired under an employee share scheme. He also holds a portfolio of US-listed shares worth NZ$50,000. Adam is considering relocating back to New Zealand but continuing to work remotely.

Current Rules: Under the FIF regime, Adam would be taxed annually on 5% of the opening value of his foreign shares. In the 2026–27 income year, this would result in NZ$100,000 of notional income, despite no dividends or realisation. At a 39% tax rate, he would face a tax bill of NZ$39,000, likely requiring him to use his salary or borrow to fund the liability.

Proposed Method: Under the Revenue Account Method, Adam would only be taxed if his shares pay dividends or are sold. If sold, he would be taxed on 70% of the capital gain, with the cost base reset to the share value when he became NZ tax resident. This approach proves to be helpful for individuals holding equity in growth-stage businesses.


What the Professional Community Is Saying
There is general agreement that the proposal represents a positive and necessary shift in how New Zealand taxes foreign investments for new residents.

The introduction of a method that taxes actual income – rather than notional returns – should be particularly useful for clients with illiquid or high-growth equity holdings, where the value may be significant on paper but difficult to monetise in the short term.

At the same time, the FIF regime remains a complex beast. There is still work to do to simplify the FIF regime overall and ensure that New Zealand’s tax system is fully aligned with the realities of a globally mobile workforce and investor base.


Next Steps
The proposed changes are expected to be included in a tax Bill introduced in the second half of 2025.
We expect the Inland Revenue will release more detailed guidance closer to the time, including technical aspects such as valuation requirements, transitional rules, and application processes.


If you have questions about how these proposed changes may affect you, please get in touch with the team at NZ Tax Desk — we’re here to help.


Disclaimer: The information in this article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy at the time of publication, the content may be subject to change as legislation develops. We recommend seeking professional advice specific to your circumstances before making any decisions or taking action in relation to the matters discussed.

by Angela Hodges 28 July 2025
Double Cab Utes, Perk Vehicles, and the End of the Exemption Era
A person is drawing a red circle around the number 30 on a calendar
by Angela Hodges 4 June 2025
The Deadline is Approaching for FY25 General Approval Applications
An aerial view of a parking lot filled with lots of cars.
by Angela Hodges 28 May 2025
The end of the Work Related Vehicle FBT Exemption.
A man is writing on a piece of paper while using a calculator.
by Angela Hodges 14 April 2025
If your business is carrying out research and development (R&D) work, you may be eligible to receive a cash payment from Inland Revenue— however there is limited time to act if you want to claim this for FY24.
A man in a suit and tie is holding a piece of paper in his hand.
by Angela Hodges 25 March 2025
Among the biggest winners from the Government’s proposed Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) reforms are likely to be US citizens living in New Zealand. The proposed Revenue Account Method, which is set to take effect from 1 April 2025, offers significant relief from the sometimes harsh and often unfair outcomes created when the US and NZ tax systems collide. The Double Tax Problem for US Citizens Unlike most countries, the United States taxes individuals based on citizenship, not residency. This means that US citizens remain fully taxable by the IRS no matter where in the world they live. When they become New Zealand tax residents, they are subject to NZ’s FIF rules – which tax unrealised gains each year. The problem is that these deemed gains are not recognised by the US tax system, which only taxes actual income or realised gains. This mismatch creates a common scenario where a US citizen in NZ pays tax to New Zealand on phantom FIF income (including unrealised capital gains) but then pays US tax again when the investment is eventually sold – with no US tax credit for the NZ tax already paid. The result is real, permanent double taxation. How the Revenue Account Method Helps The proposed Revenue Account Method addresses these challenges by bringing New Zealand’s tax treatment of FIF investments more in line with the US tax system, as it only taxes: Tax is only triggered when dividends are received or capital gains are realised, allowing US citizens to align taxable events across both jurisdictions. Capital gains are only partially taxed in NZ (70%), and foreign tax credits may be available in the US when realisation occurs (US tax advice will be required). For example, under current rules, FIF income is often calculated using the Fair Dividend Rate (FDR) method – which taxes 5% of the opening value of most foreign shares annually, even if no income is actually received. While this is straightforward from a compliance perspective, it does not align well with US capital gains tax rules, which only tax gains when they are realised. This mismatch can lead to several problems: Double taxation : US citizens in New Zealand can be taxed on notional income under the FIF regime that doesn’t correspond to any US tax liability, meaning no foreign tax credit is available in the US. Compliance complexity : The requirement to use different tax bases (realisation for US purposes, deemed accrual/unrealised gains in NZ) creates extra complexity for reporting and record-keeping. Cash flow issues : As no cash is received under FDR (and potentially CV), taxpayers may be forced to fund NZ tax from other sources or liquidate investments earlier than intended. For US citizens holding private equity, start-up shares, or unlisted interests acquired prior to NZ tax residency, this new method could make a substantial difference. It removes the need to fund NZ tax liabilities out of pocket for income never actually received. The new Revenue Account Method should be especially attractive to US citizens holding equity in start-ups, employee share schemes, or private investment vehicles, where growth potential is high but cash flow is minimal. However, it is important to remember that ultimately this method will still tax capital gains on these offshore investments, as well as taxing dividends. The Revenue Account Method should not be a default go-to for new residents, as some taxpayers may have more favourable outcomes with the existing FIF methods. See our more detailed article on the new Revenue Account Method here. Planning Tips for US Citizens and Advisors If you or your clients are US citizens becoming NZ tax residents, consider the following planning steps: Document asset values on entry : For investments eligible for the Revenue Account Method, the cost base will be the value at the time NZ tax residence begins. A formal valuation may be required to substantiate this. Review eligibility : Confirm that the taxpayer became fully tax resident in NZ on or after 1 April 2024 and that investments were acquired before residency (or pursuant to pre-residency arrangements). Coordinate with US tax advisors : Cross-border alignment is key. A coordinated strategy that considers both US and NZ tax consequences will reduce surprises and improve outcomes. Contact us to discuss how these changes could affect your US-NZ tax position. Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is general in nature and does not constitute personalised tax advice. You should consult with a qualified tax adviser familiar with both US and NZ tax systems before making any decisions based on this content.
by Angela Hodges 24 February 2025
Act Now: Help Your Clients Remove Properties from the GST Net Before the Deadline
by Angela Hodges 15 January 2025
As tax advisors, we know there has long been contention around the tax treatment of loyalty points and rewards. We have seen numerous times how large these benefits can actually be. It’s an issue that has largely been overlooked, and something that clients have certainly not wanted to know about.
by Angela Hodges 28 November 2024
As accountants, you're often confronted with specific scenarios regarding Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) and Goods and Services Tax (GST). Below are answers to some common questions.
A couple booking accommodation on their mobile phone.
by Angela Hodges 29 September 2024
How Upcoming Tax Changes Could Streamline Reporting for Short-Stay Accommodation Providers
by Angela Hodges 30 June 2024
The Inland Revenue has recently released a new draft Interpretation Statement, PUB 0040: Income tax – overdrawn shareholder loan account balances . This statement is currently open for consultation until 2 August 2024. Family-owned small businesses often operate through close companies. Given the significant control shareholders have over these companies, it is common for them to withdraw company funds for personal use. These amounts are commonly transacted through the Shareholder Current Account. The issue is when these Shareholder Current Accounts become overdrawn. In practice, the reasoning behind an overdrawn Shareholder Current Account can often be the sale of a capital asset and the withdrawal of those funds by the shareholder (without declaring a dividend). Unfortunately, we also commonly see this when a company, or the shareholders, are struggling financially. In this context it is perhaps timely, given the struggles businesses have been going through, for the Inland Revenue to issue a reminder about the potential tax issues these overdrawn Shareholder Current Accounts can present. Understanding Shareholder Loan Accounts and Their Tax Implications Firstly, the Inland Revenue refers to a Shareholder Loan Account. In practice, this is often a Shareholder Current Account, thus I have used the terminology interchangeably. Shareholder Current Accounts are generally informal arrangements between close companies and their shareholders, documenting any advances made between the two. When a shareholder withdraws more money from the company than they have advanced, the account becomes overdrawn, leading to several potential tax issues. The following tax issues apply equally to a Shareholder Loan balance, where the shareholder owes the company funds. Tax Issues Arising from Overdrawn Shareholder Loan Accounts 1. Dividend Income: If a shareholder pays no or low interest on an overdrawn loan account, dividend income may arise. For this reason, the company will generally charge the shareholders interest on the overdrawn shareholder current account. 2. Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT): Shareholder-employees who pay no or low interest on their overdrawn accounts may face FBT liabilities. 3. Interest Income: Companies charging interest on overdrawn accounts generate interest income. This interest will be taxable income to the company and may be non-deductible to the shareholder (discussed further below). 4. Resident Withholding Tax (RWT): Companies can claim a tax credit for RWT withheld from interest payable. The credit is claimable in the year the interest is derived, provided the RWT has been paid to Inland Revenue. 5. Interest Deductibility: Interest paid by shareholders on overdrawn accounts is typically not deductible as it often funds private expenditure. However, if the borrowed money is used for income-earning activities or businesses, a deduction may be available, subject to documentation and general limitations. 6. Withholding and Reporting Requirements: Shareholders paying RWT may have obligations to deduct RWT on interest paid to the company on the balance of the current account (or loan). 7. Debt Forgiveness: If a shareholder is relieved of their obligation to repay an overdrawn loan balance, this typically results in taxable debt remission income for the shareholder. For this reason, the company cannot simply forgive the loan or overdrawn balance. Importantly, the company should never be wound up with the shareholders owing the company funds, as this could also trigger taxable debt remission income. Beyond the scope of the Interpretation Statement, there are additional potential tax issues to consider with Shareholder Current Accounts: 8. Salary: If the shareholder is taking regular drawings to meet their living costs, there is support for the Inland Revenue to reconstitute these drawings as taxable salary or personal services income in some circumstances. This is particularly where the company has not paid the shareholder a reasonable market salary or met the personal services or attribution rules. 9. Documentation: There is caselaw in which loan repayments have been reconstituted as taxable income to the shareholder, however those are extreme examples involving an absence of documentation. It is always important to document all loans to the company. Any transactions between the company and the shareholder should include clear narrations e.g. on the bank transfer. Take care in those narrations, if something is labelled “salary”, chances are the IRD would argue it should be taxed as such. Understanding these tax implications is crucial for both companies and shareholders to ensure compliance and optimize their tax positions. *This publication contains generic information only. NZ Tax Desk Ltd is not responsible for any loss sustained by anyone relying on the contents of this publication. We recommend you obtain specific taxation advice for your circumstances.