The Parent Tax Trap
This week I have been working on a presentation for CAANZ about land tax issues and the many, many new rules in this area. However, there is one key issue that we are seeing again and again in practice – the Parent Tax.
The realities of getting a mortgage – first home buyers
With the housing boom that has occurred in New Zealand over the last few years, we are experiencing incredibly high house prices. This, coupled with the increasing difficulty to secure a mortgage, has meant that more and more parents are helping their children into their first homes.
Traditionally these parents would have either gifted their children part of the deposit or acted as Guarantors with the Bank. However, the Banks are now largely insisting that these parents are included in the mortgage as owners of the property, and as such, they are registered on the Title as owners.
Once the property has increased in value, and the child can support the full mortgage, the parents often transfer their interest in the property to the child at their original cost. In most of these scenarios, the parents are not trying to earn a capital gain on the property, just trying to help their child onto the property ladder.

The Parent Tax Trap
This is where the commercial reality of securing that mortgage doesn’t align with the tax rules. This is because of New Zealand’s Brightline Tax – a pseudo capital gains tax. The Brightline Rules generally mean that if you buy a residential property, and sell that again within ten years, you will be taxed on the gain, unless it is your home (or another exemption applies).
These tax rules mean that when the parent transfers their share of the property to the child within ten years, they will get taxed on any gain in value. This is because they have been treated as owners of a share of that property.
Because the parents didn’t live in the property, they cannot claim the main home exemption – they will be taxed on the sale or transfer to their child.
It doesn’t matter that the parents didn’t sell (or transfer) their share of the property to their child at market value, the IRD will deem it to be sold at market value, and tax them on any gain in value regardless.
And now that the Brightline Period has been extended to ten years, this tax is catching more and more transactions.
What is the industry doing?
Chartered Accountants Australia NZ (CAANZ) raised this issue with the Government in the latest round of discussions for the upcoming Brightline Tax changes. CAANZ had recommended a carve-out from the Brightline Rules for family-related transactions. This proposal was denied. The IRD helpfully suggested the parents act as Guarantors and not go on the Title as owners.
Another example of the IRD being out of touch with reality?
We can help
If you are a parent trying to help your child buy their first home, there are ways we can help structure this purchase to avoid this Parent Tax Trap. However, this should be done at the start.
Please get in contact , I’d love to help you get your child into their first home without you falling for the Parent Tax Trap.
*This publication contains generic information only. NZ Tax Desk Ltd is not responsible for any loss sustained by anyone relying on the contents of this publication. We recommend you obtain specific taxation advice for your circumstances.
The post The Parent Tax Trap appeared first on .

